Document Type
Book Chapter
Publication Date
2012
Published In
Visual Experience: Sensation, Cognition And Constancy
Abstract
This chapter argues that whereas perceptual experience is underconstant in one sense, it is virtually constant insofar as it is functionally stable and predictable. The possibility of distinguishing perception and cognition is explored in experiments on the perception of surface orientation. These experiments are related to the study of self-motion perception and space perception. An experiment comparing monocular and binocular perception of hills revealed perceptual differences, between-subjects, that were masked in within-subject comparisons by metacognitive strategies. A second experiment found that participants wearing heavy backpacks gave (cognitively) elevated slope estimates only because of experimental demands not physical ones. Perceptual experience is informative about perceptual processing, but reports of experience are subject to cognitive contamination. True perceptual experience may be virtually constant insofar as the perceptual consequences of actions can be correctly anticipated.
Keywords
perceptual experience, cognition, monocular perception, binocular perception, metacognition, cognitive contamination
Published By
Oxford University Press
Editor(s)
G. Hatfield And S. Allred
Recommended Citation
Frank H. Durgin; Anna Jane Ruff , '09; and Robert Calverley Russell , '08.
(2012).
"Constant Enough: On The Kinds Of Perceptual Constancy Worth Having".
Visual Experience: Sensation, Cognition And Constancy.
87-102.
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199597277.003.0005
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-psychology/534
Comments
This material was originally published in Visual Experience: Sensation, Cognition, and Constancy edited by Gary Hatfield and Sarah Allred, and has been reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. For permission to reuse this material, please visit http://global.oup.com/academic/rights.