Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2005
Published In
British Journal Of Social Work
Abstract
Assessment procedures in social work emerged within the historical context of modernist empiricism. They are lodged in assumptions of objectivity, measurement accuracy, value neutrality and scientific expertise. Within the context of postmodern constructionism, the grounds for traditional assessment are thrown into question. While such critique may seem to threaten the assessment tradition, such a conclusion is unwarranted. Rather, one may locate within the assessment tradition and constructionist writings converging lines of thought. Through the collaborative extension of two assessment exemplars—the genogram and the ecomap—we suggest new and more promising potentials for assessment practices in social work.
Recommended Citation
R. Iversen, Kenneth J. Gergen, and R. Fairbanks II.
(2005).
"Assessment And Social Construction: Conflict Or Co-Creation?".
British Journal Of Social Work.
Volume 35,
Issue 5.
689-709.
DOI: 10.1093/bjsw/bch200
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-psychology/435
Comments
This work is a postprint and is freely available courtesy of the authors.