Participation As Legitimation: The Rise Of Participatory Policy Norms In The ICC And UN Peacekeeping
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-9-2026
Published In
Global Governance
Abstract
International organizations (IO s) have increasingly deepened local public engagement, reflecting a broader shift toward inclusion and responsiveness in global governance. While scholars have examined this trend, its emergence as a distinct normative development warrants further investigation. This article analyzes two cases of this phenomenon—the International Criminal Court’s outreach and community engagement in UN peacekeeping—conceptualizing both as participatory policy norms: social expectations that IO s engage directly with those most affected by their mandates. We argue that these norms represent an underexplored mode of IO legitimation. Tracing how they are codified in policy, operationalized in practice, and justified through normative and strategic logics, we show how participation has become central to cultivating, reaffirming, and defending IO legitimacy in an increasingly contested global environment. At the same time, we highlight the tensions, constraints, and risks of symbolic performance that complicate their role as a legitimation strategy.
Keywords
international organizations, legitimacy, norms, participation, International Criminal Court, UN peacekeeping, community engagement
Recommended Citation
E. Klein and Emily Paddon Rhoads.
(2026).
"Participation As Legitimation: The Rise Of Participatory Policy Norms In The ICC And UN Peacekeeping".
Global Governance.
Volume 32,
Issue 1.
1-29.
DOI: 10.1163/19426720-03201004
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-poli-sci/783
