Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2015
Published In
Review Of International Political Economy
Abstract
The Federal Reserve (the Fed) is responsible for monitoring, analyzing and ultimately stabilizing US financial markets. It also has unrivalled access to economic data, high-level connections to financial institutions, and a large staff of professionally trained economists. Why then was it apparently unconcerned by the financial developments that are now widely recognized to have caused the 2008 financial crisis? Using a wide range of Fed documents from the pre-crisis period, particularly the transcripts of meetings of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC), this paper shows that Fed policymakers and staff were aware of relevant developments in financial markets, but paid infrequent attention to them and disregarded significant systemic threats. Drawing on literatures in economics, political science and sociology, the paper then demonstrates that the Fed's intellectual paradigm in the years before the crisis focused on ‘post hoc interventionism’ – the institution's ability to limit the fallout should a systemic disturbance arise. Further, the paper argues that institutional routines played a crucial role in maintaining this paradigm and in contributing to the Fed's inadequate attention to the warning signals in the pre-crisis period.
Recommended Citation
Stephen S. Golub, Ayse Kaya, and M. Reay.
(2015).
"What Were They Thinking? The Federal Reserve In The Run-Up To The 2008 Financial Crisis".
Review Of International Political Economy.
Volume 22,
Issue 4.
657-692.
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2014.932829
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-poli-sci/424
Comments
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Review Of International Political Economy on July 3, 2014, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/09692290.2014.932829.
A summary analysis for this article was published in Voxeu on September 8, 2014.