Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2013
Published In
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society
Abstract
X-ray satellites since Einstein have empirically established that the X-ray luminosity from single O-stars scales linearly with bolometric luminosity, L-x similar to 10(-7)L(bol). But straightforward forms of the most favoured model, in which X-rays arise from instability-generated shocks embedded in the stellar wind, predict a steeper scaling, either with mass-loss rate L-x similar to(M)over dot similar to L-bol(1.7) if the shocks are radiative or with L-x similar to (M)over dot(2) similar to L-bol(3.4) if they are adiabatic. This paper presents a generalized formalism that bridges these radiative versus adiabatic limits in terms of the ratio of the shock cooling length to the local radius. Noting that the thin-shell instability of radiative shocks should lead to extensive mixing of hot and cool material, we propose that the associated softening and weakening of the X-ray emission can be parametrized as scaling with the cooling length ratio raised to a power m, the 'mixing exponent'. For physically reasonable values m approximate to 0.4, this leads to an X-ray luminosity L-x similar to (M)over dot(0.6) similar to L-bol that matches the empirical scaling. To fit observed X-ray line profiles, we find that such radiative-shock-mixing models require the number of shocks to drop sharply above the initial shock onset radius. This in turn implies that the X-ray luminosity should saturate and even decrease for optically thick winds with very high mass-loss rates. In the opposite limit of adiabatic shocks in low-density winds (e.g. from B-stars), the X-ray luminosity should drop steeply with (M)over dot(2). Future numerical simulation studies will be needed to test the general thin-shell mixing ansatz for X-ray emission.
Recommended Citation
S. P. Owocki et al.
(2013).
"Thin-Shell Mixing In Radiative Wind-Shocks And The L-x Similar To L-bol Scaling Of O-Star X-Rays".
Monthly Notices Of The Royal Astronomical Society.
Volume 429,
Issue 4.
3379-3389.
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts599
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-physics/19
Comments
This article has been published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Royal Astronomical Society. All rights reserved.