Review Of "Wrongs And Rights Come Apart" By N. Cornell

Document Type

Book Review

Publication Date

9-2025

Published In

Choice

Abstract

Many hold that rights and wrongs are symmetrical: that is, violations of rights are always wrong, and wrongs are always violations of rights. Cornell (law, Univ. of Michigan) challenges this widespread view, arguing that while rights and wrongs often overlap, they belong to distinct moral categories that diverge systematically across such contexts as illicit promises, mistreatment of animals, and economic exploitation. Examples: John makes an unethical promise to Jane, but the breaking of the promise could still be wrong; mistreating animals is wrong, but it doesn’t follow that we must conclude that animals have rights; and one might consent to work in a sweatshop out of necessity, but consent doesn't negate the wrong. Drawing on examples from law, literature, and contemporary culture, Cornell argues that wrongs are retrospective and corrective, while rights are prospective promises. Further, Cornell maintains that potential wrongs don’t necessarily prescribe what one should do and that rights don’t always prescribe corrective action after being breached. That wrongs and rights come apart is important, he concludes, if we are to understand the richness and complexity of moral relationships and obligations. This book is rigorous yet accessible and sheds light on the diverse and complex web of moral life. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Advanced undergraduates through faculty.

Comments

This work is freely available courtesy of Choice Reviews. The review has been reproduced in full in the abstract field.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS