Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2017
Published In
Conversations: The Journal Of Cavellian Studies
Abstract
In the second paragraph of “The Avoidance of Love,” the earliest of his essays on Shakespeare, Cavell asks, “What has discouraged attention from investigations of character?” in Shakespeare criticism of the mid-twentieth century. “What […] has [instead] specifically motivated an absorbing attention to words?”, as in the criticism of William Empson and G. Wilson Knight. The answer that Cavell offers is that it is “the merest assumption,” foisted off on us “by some philosophy or other, that [literary] characters are not people, [and] that what can be known about people cannot be known about characters” (DK, 40). Cavell then goes on to challenge this assumption by noting that it is at the very least quite natural “to account for the behavior of characters” by applying “to them [psychological predicates, like ‘is in pain,’ ‘is ironic,’ ‘is jealous,’ and ‘is thinking of …’” (DK, 40).
Recommended Citation
Richard Thomas Eldridge.
(2017).
"“This Most Human Predicament”: Cavell On Language, Intention, And Desire In Shakespeare".
Conversations: The Journal Of Cavellian Studies.
Issue 5.
118-128.
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-philosophy/534
Comments
This work is freely available courtesy of Conversations: The Journal Of Cavellian Studies. It is also freely available on the journal's website.