Psychological Conflict And Human Nature: The Case Of Behaviourism And Cognition
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
10-1-1980
Published In
Journal For The Theory Of Social Behaviour
Abstract
A reasonable choice between Skinner's and Chomsky's theories requires reference to a conception of human nature. It is explained in detail why this is so, in the context of an analysis of what it is to ‘choose’ a theory. This account helps to explain the unity and coherence of the science, methodology, conception of science, object of scientific inquiry and views towards control of each of Skinner and Chomsky, and thereby explains the chasm which separates the parties to their respective programs. The analysis given implies that, in a precise sense, the theory-choice is implicated in value-judgments.
Recommended Citation
Hugh Lacey.
(1980).
"Psychological Conflict And Human Nature: The Case Of Behaviourism And Cognition".
Journal For The Theory Of Social Behaviour.
Volume 10,
Issue 3.
131-156.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-5914.1980.tb00012.x
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-philosophy/479