Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2023
Published In
New England Journal Of Statistics In Data Science
Abstract
Approximate confidence distribution computing (ACDC) offers a new take on the rapidly developing field of likelihood-free inference from within a frequentist framework. The appeal of this computational method for statistical inference hinges upon the concept of a confidence distribution, a special type of estimator which is defined with respect to the repeated sampling principle. An ACDC method provides frequentist validation for computational inference in problems with unknown or intractable likelihoods. The main theoretical contribution of this work is the identification of a matching condition necessary for frequentist validity of inference from this method. In addition to providing an example of how a modern understanding of confidence distribution theory can be used to connect Bayesian and frequentist inferential paradigms, we present a case to expand the current scope of so-called approximate Bayesian inference to include non-Bayesian inference by targeting a confidence distribution rather than a posterior. The main practical contribution of this work is the development of a data-driven approach to drive ACDC in both Bayesian or frequentist contexts. The ACDC algorithm is data-driven by the selection of a data-dependent proposal function, the structure of which is quite general and adaptable to many settings. We explore three numerical examples that both verify the theoretical arguments in the development of ACDC and suggest instances in which ACDC outperform approximate Bayesian computing methods computationally.
Keywords
Approximate Bayesian inference, Confidence distribution, Computational inference
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Recommended Citation
Suzanne Thornton, W. Li, and M. Xie.
(2023).
"Approximate Confidence Distribution Computing".
New England Journal Of Statistics In Data Science.
Volume 1,
Issue 2.
270-282.
DOI: 10.51387/23-NEJSDS38
https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-math-stat/306
Comments
This work is freely available under a Creative Commons license