Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-2008

Published In

Philosophy And Phenomenological Research

Abstract

Epistemological contextualism - the claim that the truth-value of knowledge-attributions can vary with the context of the attributor - has recently faced a whole series of objections. The most serious one, however, has not been discussed much so far: the factivity objection. In this paper, I explain what the objection is and present three different versions of the objection. I then show that there is a good way out for the contextualist. However, in order to solve the problem the contextualist has to accept a relationalist version of contextualism.

Comments

This work is a preprint and is freely available courtesy of Wiley and Philosophy and Phenomenological Research with the Philosophy Documentation Center and the International Phenomenological Society.

The final publication version can be freely accessed courtesy of Wiley's Content Sharing service.

fac-philosophy-11_accessible.docx (49 kB)
Accessible document [Word]

Additional Files

fac-philosophy-11_accessible.docx (49 kB)
Accessible document [Word]

Plum Print visual indicator of research metrics
PlumX Metrics
  • Citations
    • Citation Indexes: 29
  • Usage
    • Downloads: 204
    • Abstract Views: 10
  • Captures
    • Readers: 17
see details

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS
 

An accessible version of this publication has been made available courtesy of Swarthmore College Libraries. For further accessibility assistance, please contact openaccess@swarthmore.edu with the title or URL of any relevant works.