Document Type

Book Chapter

Publication Date

2017

Published In

Moral Victories: The Ethics Of Winning Wars

Abstract

According to just war theory, military campaigns should only be fought as a last resort, with the goal of correcting a grave evil, and where there is a high probability of success. But what happens when a military campaign unravels and becomes unwinnable? How can a leader reconcile just war theory with the need to extricate the country from a quagmire? In recent decades, US presidents have repeatedly faced such moral dilemmas, as campaigns in Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, and Iraq all became unwinnable. When victory is no longer achievable, leaders should dial down the goals of the war, resist the pressure to embrace barbarism, negotiate with the adversary, and seek the best possible peace from the range of plausible alternatives.

Keywords

just war theory, unwinnable wars, negotiation, Vietnam, Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan

Published By

Oxford University Press

Editor(s)

A. R. Hom, C. O'Driscoll, and K. Mills

Comments

This material was originally published in Moral Victories: The Ethics of Winning Wars edited by Andrew R. Hom, Cian O'Driscoll, and Kurt Mills, and has been reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press https://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/oso/9780198801825.001.0001/oso-9780198801825-chapter-8. For permission to reuse this material, please visit http://global.oup.com/academic/rights.

Share

COinS