Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-1998

Published In

Behavioral And Brain Sciences

Abstract

Although Pessoa et al. imply that many aspects of the filling-in debate may be displaced by a regard for active vision, they remain loyal to naive neural reductionist explanations of certain pieces of psychophysical evidence. Alternative interpretations are provided for two specific examples and a new category of filling-in (of visual detail) is proposed.

Comments

This work is freely available courtesy of Cambridge University Press.

Included in

Psychology Commons

Share

COinS