Document Type

Article

Publication Date

7-2008

Published In

Philosophical Quarterly

Abstract

In his recent book "Moral Skepticisms" Walter Sinnott-Armstrong argues in great detail for contrastivism with respect to justified moral belief and moral knowledge. I raise three questions concerning this view. First, how would Sinnott-Armstrong account for constraints on admissible contrast classes? Secondly, how would he deal with notorious problems concerning relevant reference classes? Finally, how can he account for basic features of moral agency? It turns out that the last problem is the most serious one for his account.

Comments

This work is a preprint that is freely available courtesy of Wiley.

The final publication version can be freely accessed courtesy of Wiley's Content Sharing service.

Included in

Philosophy Commons

Share

COinS