Parsimony And Inference To The Best Mathematical Explanation
Indispensability-based arguments for mathematical platonism are typically motivated by drawing an analogy between abstract mathematical objects and concrete scientific posits. In this paper, I argue that mathematics can sometimes help to reduce our concrete ontological, ideological, and structural commitments. My focus is on optimization explanations, and in particular the case study involving periodical cicadas. I argue that in this case, stronger mathematical apparatus yields explanations that have fewer concrete commitments. The nominalist cannot accept these more parsimonious explanations without embracing the stronger mathematics, and this poses a challenge for the nominalist position.
Indispensability, Mathematical explanation, Platonism, Nominalism, Periodical cicadas, Parsimony
Alan Richard Baker.
"Parsimony And Inference To The Best Mathematical Explanation".
This document is currently not available here.